Visit page
Press "Enter" to skip to content

Letter to the Editor: The retired court reporter – another view

When I was a student reporter back in the 1970s, I sat in with an official who worked for a federal judge in downtown Baltimore. The trial involved murder, intimidation, Hell’s Angels, and a threat on the life of the judge and his family. After a long day in court, the reporter would have to go back to the judge’s chambers and read hours of testimony from paper notes at points where the judge’s attention slipped away to other things, like being on a hit list. I loved being an insider and knowing what was going to be in the newspaper ahead of time. What a cool job, I remember thinking.

Fast forward 30 years. Reporting has been good to me and my family. My daughter knew the difference between expedited and daily by the time she was five. My husband knew when I complained about wall-to-wall, it wasn’t about the carpet and not to ask too many questions when I had grand jury duty.

But I digress. What I want to say is we as reporters have a front seat to the news. I have known reporters who have traveled not only all over the United States, but everywhere from Bermuda for Lloyds of London to Europe to report war crimes. Another reported a high-profile court mar tial that is ongoing. How difficult it is to give it all up. So I didn’t.

My husband and I moved to South Carolina to retire, but I ended up working another five years just because I wasn’t ready to call it quits. While I was still reporting in South Carolina, I started scoping on an as-needed basis for a long-time friend. Lucky for me, Ronda worked with me and my schedule during the past three years of reporting and, when I retired formally, I transitioned easily into being an almost full-time scopist. It has kept me in the loop, kept me active in reporting news, kept my brain fine-tuned, and also given me extra money to spend on fun things in Myrtle Beach, which I now call home.

The schedule can be feast or famine, relaxing or harried, depending on what trial or daily is going on, just like when I was reporting. But we all know about that, right? But on days I go out with my retired friends, I always have interesting stories to tell them, although I can see their eyes glaze over when I explain what I do. I’ve taken the easy way out and now say that I proofread and edit.

One other thing I’ve done is taken my steno machine to the nearby nursing home and help the mostly elderly women write whatever they want. Sometimes it’s letters to children who have stopped coming to see them, to long-deceased husbands, or sometimes just memories from childhood. They watch magic happen on my laptop and then I deliver a printed copy to them the next day. Truth be told, it truly is magic to see their faces and more rewarding than probably anything other than CART.

So, yes, there is life after reporting. Actually, it’s pretty darn good.

Helen Giayvia
Myrtle Beach, S.C.


Letter to the editor policy

The “Letters to the Editor” section of the JCR is meant to facilitate free and civil debate among the readers of the magazine. If you have comments you would like to make about topics in these pages or issues you feel are important to the community of members, please send your Letter to the Editor to JCR Editor Jacqueline Schmidt, NCRA, 8224 Old Courthouse Rd., Vienna, VA 22182 or by e-mail to

We will strive to publish as many letters as possible in the pages of the JCR itself. Should we receive more letters than there is space to publish within the pages of the magazine, a representative sample of comments received will appear in print and a fuller presentation will be published online. (Space available in the printed version of the JCR for letters is limited not only by the number of letters received but also by the volume of other materials in the remainder of the magazine.)

There may be occasions when we are unable to publish a letter to the editor or must insist that the author edit its content, but this is never a matter that we take lightly. We encourage vigorous debate and the presentation of a diversity of points of view but cannot permit the publication of materials that create exposure to potential legal liability for the author, NCRA and/or the JCR. Items that may trigger increased scrutiny include (but are not limited to) discussion of rates, calling for boycotts, making libelous statements, and other matters prohibited under antitrust, libel, or other governing laws. In these cases, there may be a need to restructure a letter, and the editor would be happy to give guidance on how to do so.

Statements of fact and opinion contained in letters to the editor (in print or online) and within the editorial content of the magazine are and will remain solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily express the opinion or endorsement of NCRA or anyone connected with NCRA.